Thursday, November 5, 2009

Good Dog, Smart Dog


Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 1, 2009

Life as a Labradoodle may sound free and easy, but if you’re Jet, who lives in New Jersey, there is a lot of work to be done.

He is both a seizure alert dog and a psychiatric service dog whose owner has epilepsy, severe anxiety, depression, various phobias and hypoglycemia. Jet has been trained to anticipate seizures, panic attacks and plunging blood sugar and will alert his owner to these things by staring intently at her until she does something about the problem. He will drop a toy in her lap to snap her out of a dissociative state. If she has a seizure, he will position himself so that his body is under her head to cushion a fall.

Jet seems like a genius, but is he really so smart? In fact, is any of it in his brain, or is it mostly in his sniff?

The matter of what exactly goes on in the mind of a dog is a tricky one, and until recently much of the research on canine intelligence has been met with large doses of skepticism. But over the last several years a growing body of evidence, culled from small scientific studies of dogs’ abilities to do things like detect cancer or seizures, solve complex problems (complex for a dog, anyway), and learn language suggests that they may know more than we thought they did.

Their apparent ability to tune in to the needs of psychiatric patients, turning on lights for trauma victims afraid of the dark, reminding their owners to take medication and interrupting behaviors like suicide attempts and self-mutilation, for example, has lately attracted the attention of researchers.

In September, the Army announced that it would spend $300,000 to study the impact of pairing psychiatric service dogs like Jet with soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with post-traumatic stress disorder. Both the House and Senate have recently passed bills that would finance the training and placement of these dogs with veterans.

Hungarian researchers reported in a study last year that a guide dog for a blind and epileptic person became anxious before its master suffered a seizure and was taught to bark and lick the owner’s face and upper arm when it detected an onset, three to five minutes before the seizure. It is still somewhat mysterious how exactly dogs detect seizures, whether it’s by picking up on behavioral changes or smelling something awry, but several small studies have shown that a powerful sense of smell can detect lung and other types of cancer, as the dogs sniff out odors emitted by the disease.

Beyond these perceptual abilities, in which trainers can use the dogs’ natural instincts, some research has examined dogs’ actual cognitive ability, and found not just good doggie, but smart doggie.

“I believe that so much research has come out lately suggesting that we may have underestimated certain aspects of the mental ability of dogs that even the most hardened cynic has to think twice before rejecting the possibilities,” said Stanley Coren, a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia and an author of several books on dogs.

Dr. Coren’s work on intelligence, along with other research suggesting that the canine brain processes information something like the way people do, has drawn criticism. And there is good reason. For most of the last century the specter of a horse named Clever Hans hung over anyone who tried to prove that dogs were acting in thoughtful ways — not merely mimicking or manipulating people into believing that they in fact grasped human concepts.

Clever Hans was said to be able to count, make change and tell time by tapping his hoof, until investigators in the early 1900s learned that Hans was merely responding to his trainer’s body language, tapping when the trainer nodded his head. This provided an enduring example for those who believed thought was the exclusive domain of humans.

But in 2004, German researchers reported that a border collie named Rico could learn the name of an object in one try, had 200 objects in his repertoire and remembered them all a month later, all very human. Even skeptical animal behavior researchers found the Rico results impressive and sound. Is it possible that Rico turned the tide on the Clever Hans problem, even though there is debate about how we can reliably measure what dogs know?

By giving dogs language learning and other tests devised for infants and toddlers, Dr. Coren has come up with an intelligence ranking of 100 breeds, with border collies at No. 1. He says the most intelligent breeds (poodles, retrievers, Labradors and shepherds) can learn as many as 250 words, signs and signals, while the others can learn 165. The average dog is about as intellectually advanced as a 2- to 2-and-a-half-year-old child, he has concluded, with an ability to understand some abstract concepts. For example, the animal can get “the idea of being a dog” by differentiating photographs with dogs in them from photographs without dogs.

But Clive D. L. Wynne, an associate professor of psychology at the University of Florida who specializes in canine cognition and has himself said he met a border collie who knew 1,500 words, takes issue with efforts to compare human and canine brains.

He argues that it is dogs’ deep sensitivity to the humans around them, their obedience under rigorous training, and their desire to please that can explain most of these capabilities. They may be deft at reading human cues — and teachable — but that doesn’t mean they are thinking like people, he says. A dog’s entire world revolves around its primary owner, and it will respond to that person to get what it wants, usually food, treats or affection.

“I take the view that dogs have their own unique way of thinking,” Dr. Wynne said. “It’s a happy accident that doggie thinking and human thinking overlap enough that we can have these relationships with dogs, but we shouldn’t kid ourselves that dogs are viewing the world the way we do.”

Building With Whole Trees

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 5, 2009


STODDARD, Wis.

ROALD GUNDERSEN, an architect who may revolutionize the building industry, shinnied up a slender white ash near his house here on a recent afternoon, hoisting himself higher and higher until the limber trunk began to bend slowly toward the forest floor.

“Look at Papa!” his life and business partner, Amelia Baxter, 31, called to their 3-year-old daughter, Estella, who was crouching in the leaves, reaching for a mushroom. Their son, Cameron, 9 months, was nestled in a sling across Ms. Baxter’s chest.

Wild mushrooms and watercress are among the treasures of this 134-acre forest, but its greatest resource is its small-diameter trees — thousands like the one Mr. Gundersen, 49, was hugging like a monkey.

“Whooh!” he said, jumping to the ground and gingerly rubbing his back. “This isn’t as easy as it used to be. But see how the tree holds the memory of the weight?”

The ash, no more than five inches thick, was still bent toward the ground. Mr. Gundersen will continue to work on it, bending and pruning it over the next few years in this forest which lies about 10 miles east of the Mississippi River and 150 miles northwest of Madison.

Loggers pass over such trees because they are too small to mill, but this forester-architect, who founded Gundersen Design in 1991 and built his first house here two years later, has made a career of working with them.

“Curves are stronger than straight lines,” he explained. “A single arch supporting a roof can laterally brace the building in all directions.”

The firm, recently renamed Whole Tree Architecture and Construction, is also owned by Ms. Baxter, a onetime urban farmer and community organizer with a knack for administration and fundraising. She also manages a community forest project modeled after a community-supported agriculture project, in which paying members harvest sustainable riches like mushrooms, firewood and watercress from these woods, and those who want to build a house can select from about 1,000 trees, inventoried according to species, size and shape, and located with global positioning system coordinates, a living inventory that was paid for with a $150,000 grant from the United States Department of Agriculture.

According to research by the Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, run by the USDA, a whole, unmilled tree can support 50 percent more weight than the largest piece of lumber milled from the same tree. So Mr. Gundersen uses small-diameter trees as rafters and framing in his airy structures, and big trees felled by wind, disease or insects as powerful columns and curving beams.

Taking small trees from a crowded stand in the forest is much like thinning carrots in a row: the remaining plants get more light, air and nutrients. Carrots grow longer and straighter; trees get bigger and healthier.

And when the trees are left whole, they sequester carbon. “For every ton of wood, a ton and a half of carbon dioxide is locked up,” he said, whereas producing a ton of steel releases two to five tons of carbon. So the more whole wood is used in place of steel, the less carbon is pumped into the air.

These passive solar structures also need very little or no supplemental heat.

Tom Spaulding, the executive director of Angelic Organics Learning Center, near Rockford, Ill., northwest of Chicago, knows about this because he commissioned Mr. Gundersen to build a 1,600-square-foot training center in 2003. He said: “In the middle of winter, on a 20-below day, we’re in shorts, with the windows and doors open. And we don’t burn a bit of petroleum.”

“It’s eminently more frugal and sustainable than milling trees,” he added. “These are weed trees, so when you take them out, you improve the forest stand and get a building out of it. You haven’t stripped an entire hillside out west to build it, or used a lot of oil to transport the lumber.”

Mr. Gundersen had a rough feeling for all of this 16 years ago, when he started building a simple A-frame house here for his first wife and their son, Ian, now 15. He wanted to encourage local farmers to use materials like wood and straw from their own farms to build low-cost, energy-efficient structures. So he used small aspens that were crowding out young oaks nearby.

“I would just carry them home and peel them,” said Mr. Gundersen, who later realized he could peel them while they were standing, making them “a lot lighter to haul and not so dangerous to fell.”

Mr. Gundersen, who built most of the house singlehandedly, also recognized the beauty of large trees downed by disease or wind, and used the peeled trunks, shorn of their central branches a few feet from the crook, as supporting columns in the house. “I thought they were beautiful, but I didn’t think how strong they were,” he said.

“In architecture, how materials come together and how they are connected is really the god in the details,” he continued. “The connection is where things will fall apart,” he said, adding that the crook of a tree “has been time-tested by environmental conditions for 200 million years.”

He refers to that first house — which cost $15,000 (for plumbing, electrical, septic and other basic amenities, as well as $4,000 in paid labor) and a year of his own labor — as his master’s degree in architecture. Divorced in 1997, he now lives there with Ms. Baxter and their two children.

After finishing the A-frame, Mr. Gundersen built a 100-by-20-foot solar greenhouse next door with thick straw-bale walls on three sides, banked into the north slope. He used small-diameter, rot-resistant black locust trees for the timber framing.

A wall of double-paned glass, positioned to optimize the low-angle winter light, faces south. Growing beds angled slightly toward the sun are planted with rows of mustard greens, kale, chard, arugula, lettuces and herbs. Hanging trays of micro-greens and a fig and bay tree promise fresh food for the fall and winter.

But it is the Book End — the little house attached to the greenhouse, which is home to the firm’s project manager and his wife — that quietly vibrates with the spirit of the forest.

“We used a lot of standing dead elm here,” Mr. Gundersen said, pointing out the delicate trails, or galleries, left by the beetles that killed the tree. Peeled of their bark and satiny smooth, these trees have a presence that seems to draw one’s arm around their trunks and invite a viewer to lean into them, to soak up strength from these powerful old souls.

In this quiet farming community, where people may not have a lot of money to spend, but do have plenty of wood and straw, word of the beauty and practicality of Mr. Gundersen’s structures has spread. Solar greenhouses made of local materials can extend the growing season through winter, even in a place where temperatures can drop to 30 or 40 below. In the last 18 years, Whole Trees has built 25 of them here.

It’s part of a vision Mr. Gundersen developed after spending three years as a project architect on Biosphere 2, the three-acre glass-enclosed miniature world constructed near Tucson in the 1980s, which tried to replicate the earth’s systems, but foundered on carbon dioxide, acidic seas, failed crops and internal intrigues. After that experience, he wanted to build something more basic to human needs.

Mr. Gundersen grew up in nearby LaCrosse, where his Norwegian great-grandfather, a doctor, founded a local institution, the Gundersen Clinic; he comes from a clan of doctors and tree lovers. “There are 23 doctors in the family,” he said, including his father and uncle and four great-uncles, but he seems to be wired more like his great-grandmother Helga, whose family still owns a tree farm in Norway. He and his grandmother would often picnic on this piece of wild land, where he remembers picking watercress and wildflowers and building tree forts.

Now, to be in his buildings is to be among the trees.

“It almost feels like we’re in a forest, the trees have such a presence,” said Marcia Halligan, a client who is a farmer and Reiki instructor, standing among the birch posts of her airy bedroom.

She and her partner, Steven Adams, who grows seed for organic seed companies, worked with Mr. Gundersen on a design that uses 22 different kinds of wood, most of it from their own land outside Viroqua, southeast of Stoddard.

The economic downturn has put commissions for several large buildings for nonprofits and a 4,600-square-foot residence on hold, Mr. Gundersen and Ms. Baxter say, but the demand for small houses like theirs is up.

“It’s remarkable how many people have called this last year asking for 1,000-square-foot houses,” Ms. Baxter said. “People are downsizing for their retirement homes, and even younger folks are thinking about energy costs, environmental awareness and simplicity.”

Whole Trees can keep construction costs as low as $100 a square foot, not including site preparation, if the client is willing to shop for secondhand fixtures and the like.

As people begin to see forests as a resource, they may begin to take care of them rather than cutting them down to make room for cornfields or pastures. And the forests keep giving back.

“I’ve taken 20 trees per year off one acre, for 12 buildings,” Mr. Gundersen said. “You can never tell that we’ve taken out that much wood.”

Today's Reading

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 5, 2009

Thursday of the Thirty-first Week in Ordinary Time Lectionary: 488

Reading 1
Responsorial Psalm
Gospel

Reading 1
Rom 14:7-12

Brothers and sisters:
None of us lives for oneself, and no one dies for oneself.
For if we live, we live for the Lord,
and if we die, we die for the Lord;
so then, whether we live or die, we are the Lord’s.
For this is why Christ died and came to life,
that he might be Lord of both the dead and the living.
Why then do you judge your brother or sister?
Or you, why do you look down on your brother or sister?
For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of God;
for it is written:

As I live, says the Lord, every knee shall bend before me,
and every tongue shall give praise to God.

So then each of us shall give an account of himself to God.


Responsorial Psalm
Ps 27:1bcde, 4, 13-14

R. ( 13) I believe that I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living.
The LORD is my light and my salvation;
whom should I fear?
The LORD is my life’s refuge;
of whom should I be afraid?
R. I believe that I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living.
One thing I ask of the LORD;
this I seek:
To dwell in the house of the LORD
all the days of my life,
That I may gaze on the loveliness of the LORD
and contemplate his temple.
R. I believe that I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living.
I believe that I shall see the bounty of the LORD
in the land of the living.
Wait for the LORD with courage;
be stouthearted, and wait for the LORD.
R. I believe that I shall see the good things of the Lord in the land of the living.


Gospel
Lk 15:1-10

The tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to listen to Jesus,
but the Pharisees and scribes began to complain, saying,
“This man welcomes sinners and eats with them.”
So Jesus addressed this parable to them.
“What man among you having a hundred sheep and losing one of them
would not leave the ninety-nine in the desert
and go after the lost one until he finds it?
And when he does find it,
he sets it on his shoulders with great joy
and, upon his arrival home,
he calls together his friends and neighbors and says to them,
‘Rejoice with me because I have found my lost sheep.’
I tell you, in just the same way
there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents
than over ninety-nine righteous people
who have no need of repentance.

“Or what woman having ten coins and losing one
would not light a lamp and sweep the house,
searching carefully until she finds it?
And when she does find it,
she calls together her friends and neighbors
and says to them,
‘Rejoice with me because I have found the coin that I lost.’
In just the same way, I tell you,
there will be rejoicing among the angels of God
over one sinner who repents.”


Wednesday, November 4, 2009

A White House Chef Who Wears Two Hats

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 4, 2009


WASHINGTON

TWICE a month, President Obama’s senior policy advisers gather at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building to hash out strategies for improving the health of the country’s children. Among the assistant secretaries, chiefs of staff and senior aides sits an unlikely participant: a bald, intense young man who happens to be the newest White House chef.

His name is Sam Kass. And when he’s not grilling fish for the first family or tending tomatillos in the White House garden, he is pondering the details of child nutrition legislation, funding streams for the school lunch program and the best tactics to fight childhood obesity.

Part chef and part policy wonk, he is reinventing the role of official gastronome in the Executive Mansion. Indeed, Obama administration officials describe him as a vital conduit to the first family. “How do I get to the first lady, how do I try to transmit ideas and messages to her? Sam Kass,” said Kathleen Merrigan, the deputy agriculture secretary. “He’s been a real ally when we talk about farm to school.”

Mr. Kass, 29, forged a close bond with the Obamas while cooking for them and their children for about two years before they moved to Washington and has golfed with the president on Martha’s Vineyard. Behind the scenes, he attends briefings on child nutrition and health, has vetted nonprofits as potential partners for White House food initiatives and regularly peppers senior staff about policy matters. (“Do we have a toxicologist who specializes in colony collapse disorder?” Mr. Kass asked in a recent e-mail message about the Department of Agriculture’s position on honey bees, Ms. Merrigan recalled.)

For some former White House officials, this is nothing short of astonishing. Walter Scheib, the executive White House chef during the Clinton and Bush administrations, called Mr. Kass’s involvement in public policy unique.

While he is steeped in all matters locavore and was a moving force behind the White House garden, Mr. Kass has no formal culinary training and has never run a restaurant or hotel kitchen. (He graduated with a history degree from the University of Chicago and honed his culinary skills at Avec, a Chicago restaurant, before becoming a private chef.)

In recent months, Mr. Kass has emerged as one of the most high-profile promoters of Michelle Obama’s healthy living agenda. He has baked Swiss chard frittatas for students on the White House lawn, prepared chicken salad with red onions and toasted almonds at the Department of Agriculture’s cafeteria and sprinkled crab meal and ladybugs — instead of chemical fertilizers and pesticides — on the first lady’s garden.

“You look around our country and you see that we have a lot of major challenges, the origin of which is food,” said Mr. Kass, who wore a suit and tie instead of kitchen whites during an interview in the East Reception Room of the White House. “It’s not a big step to think about a) What am I doing? How is that affecting this problem? How am I helping?

“Cooking for people’s pleasure is obviously a nice thing to do,” he said, “but the No. 1 reason we eat is to nourish ourselves and take care of ourselves.”

Mr. Kass’s title is assistant White House chef and food initiative coordinator. Friends say he cooks primarily for the Obamas, while the executive chef, Cristeta Comerford, handles most formal gatherings. “He really has been put in place for a different role, for advising the first lady, for being the face of the place,” Mr. Scheib said. “It’s great that someone who is still physically in the kitchen, chopping, dicing, roasting, physically cooking, not just talking about cooking, would be part of that discussion.”

But after reading yet another mention of the young chef’s physique, Mr. Scheib warned that the buzz was a bit overblown. (People magazine called Mr. Kass one of “Barack’s Beauties” in its list of 100 Most Beautiful people this year.) “Let’s remember: the guy’s a cook,” Mr. Scheib said. “There are people who are much more qualified to talk about nutrition than cooks. At the end of the day, we make food; we’re not geniuses.”

Still, proponents of sustainable farming and locally grown, organic foods are cheering Mr. Kass on. Dan Barber, the chef at Blue Hill in Greenwich Village, said Mrs. Obama and Mr. Kass were helping Americans “think about food in a different way.”

Melody Barnes, the president’s domestic policy adviser, who convenes the bimonthly meetings on children’s health, described Mr. Kass as remarkably “in tune” with Mrs. Obama’s thinking, though Ms. Barnes joked that she and her colleagues feared he might show up with “über-healthy cupcakes.”

Not to worry. Mr. Kass, who loved making pancakes for his parents when he was growing up in Chicago, is known for creating healthy and tasty dishes. “He was a focused, clean, hardworking cook who really knew what good food should taste like,” said Paul Kahan, the executive chef and a partner at Avec. “But he always made it very clear that his goal was not to work his way up through the ranks in the kitchen. He wanted to be involved socially with food.”

That’s why Mr. Kass became the executive chef at the Jane Addams Hull-House Museum in Chicago last year, where he offered up free soup, encouraged food-related debate and sharply criticized the modern agricultural system.

In blogs on the museum’s Web site, Mr. Kass linked government agricultural subsidies to a national lunch program that he described as disproportionately high in fat, preservatives and high-fructose corn syrup.

“We find ourselves in a fight to salvage a food system that has been ravaged by an approach of quantity over quality,” he wrote. “The industry our society has built around food is harmful and unsustainable.”

Mr. Kass has toned down that kind of talk since he came to the White House in January. These days, he describes big agricultural producers and fertilizer and pesticide companies as “partners,” not obstacles to reform.

That has not assuaged the White House’s critics.

After Mr. Kass said the White House garden would not use pesticides, the Mid America CropLife Association, an agricultural chemical trade group, urged Mrs. Obama to acknowledge the benefits of conventional agriculture to families who lack the time or means to tend backyard gardens.

Jeffrey Stier of the American Council on Science and Health, a consumer education group financed by big food makers, said the Obama message was unrealistic for ordinary families.

“The average family can’t feed themselves all year round on their own garden,” Mr. Stier said. “If you’re concerned about cost, organic and locally grown is more expensive and you don’t get any nutritional benefit from it.”

Mr. Kass and other officials say improving school lunches and widening access to farmers’ markets for people on government aid will benefit the poor. “He’s often the one who stops the conversation and says, ‘People will do this and won’t do that,’ ” said Jocelyn Frye, Mrs. Obama’s policy director, who has pronounced Mr. Kass’s collard greens and barbecued chicken “very good.”

As for his own tastes? He confesses to only a few indulgences, including tacos and chicken wings, though his friend, Tara Lane, a former pastry chef at Avec, described him as a “human garbage disposal.”

Mr. Kass says the enthusiasm he encounters at schools, federal agencies, farmers’ markets and the like shows “there’s a lot of desire to make change.”

But he is keenly aware of the challenges. On a visit to a school that prides itself on its healthy lunches, Mr. Kass watched ruefully as students plucked each vegetable off their pizzas. “It’s got to taste good, you know?” he said. “They’re not going to eat it, no matter how healthy it is, if it doesn’t taste good.”

Today's Reading

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 4, 2009

Wednesday of the Thirty-first Week in Ordinary Time Lectionary: 487

Reading 1
Responsorial Psalm
Gospel

Reading 1
Rom 13:8-10

Brothers and sisters:
Owe nothing to anyone, except to love one another;
for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law.
The commandments, You shall not commit adultery;
you shall not kill;
you shall not steal;
you shall not covet,
and whatever other commandment there may be,
are summed up in this saying, namely,
You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
Love does no evil to the neighbor;
hence, love is the fulfillment of the law.


Responsorial Psalm
Ps 112:1b-2, 4-5, 9

R. ( 5a) Blessed the man who is gracious and lends to those in need.
or:
R. Alleluia.
Blessed the man who fears the LORD,
who greatly delights in his commands.
His posterity shall be mighty upon the earth;
the upright generation shall be blessed.
R. Blessed the man who is gracious and lends to those in need.
or:
R. Alleluia.
He dawns through the darkness, a light for the upright;
he is gracious and merciful and just.
Well for the man who is gracious and lends,
who conducts his affairs with justice.
R. Blessed the man who is gracious and lends to those in need.
or:
R. Alleluia.
Lavishly he gives to the poor;
his generosity shall endure forever;
his horn shall be exalted in glory.
R. Blessed the man who is gracious and lends to those in need.
or:
R. Alleluia.


Gospel
Lk 14:25-33

Great crowds were traveling with Jesus,
and he turned and addressed them,
“If anyone comes to me without hating his father and mother,
wife and children, brothers and sisters,
and even his own life,
he cannot be my disciple.
Whoever does not carry his own cross and come after me
cannot be my disciple.
Which of you wishing to construct a tower
does not first sit down and calculate the cost
to see if there is enough for its completion?
Otherwise, after laying the foundation
and finding himself unable to finish the work
the onlookers should laugh at him and say,
‘This one began to build but did not have the resources to finish.’
Or what king marching into battle would not first sit down
and decide whether with ten thousand troops
he can successfully oppose another king
advancing upon him with twenty thousand troops?
But if not, while he is still far away,
he will send a delegation to ask for peace terms.
In the same way,
everyone of you who does not renounce all his possessions
cannot be my disciple.”


Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Merkel urges US, Europe to 'tear down today's walls'"

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

03.11.2009


German Chancellor Angela Merkel addressing a joint session of Congress, Nov. 3, 2009, on Capitol Hill

Angela Merkel accepted a rare invitation and addressed the US Congress to mark the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. The German chancellor made it clear that climate change is a top priority.

Standing before members of the US Senate and the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill, Chancellor Angela Merkel acknowledged the honor given to her. "Thank you," she said responding to the applause. "It is very moving."

She noted that she was making her address shortly before the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. The chancellor received a standing ovation when she mentioned the historic events of November 9, 1989.

Early on in her address, Merkel paid tribute to the six million Jews and other victims who were killed during the Holocaust. She pointed out that on November 9, 1938, 50 years before the fall of the Wall, the Nazis pillaged and destroyed Germany's synagogues at what proved to be the start of the pogroms against Jews, which she called a "break with civilization."

Recalling her childhood and youth in communist East Germany, Merkel said that in her wildest dreams she would not have thought all those years ago that it would be possible for her visit the US, "the land of unlimited dreams."

Passion for the American dream

She went on to say that although the "barbed wire" held her back, she was always "passionate about the American dream." In a lighter vein, she recalled how she was enamored of a "certain brand of American jeans," drawing laughs from the assembly.

The chancellor paid tribute to US President Ronald Reagan, who urged then Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to "tear down this wall" between the East and West. "This appeal will remain forever in my heart," Merkel said.

She also paid tribute to ex-President George Bush Sr., former German chancellor Helmut Kohl and Gorbachev for their roles in bringing down the Berlin Wall.

"Where there used to be a dark wall, a door suddenly opened through it. We all walked through it," Merkel said. She recalled how, inspired by the momentous event, she herself had given up a career as a physicist to take up politics.

Merkel giving her address before both houses of CongressBildunterschrift: The chancellor urged the US and Europe to take a leadership role in tackling climate change

Globalization, trans-Atlantic ties and Iran

Merkel also used her speech to make a strong case for globalization, saying "the alternative to globalization would be shutting ourselves off from the rest of the world."

Admitting that Europe and America did not always see eye to eye on all issues, the chancellor insisted that the US could find no better partner than Europe and vice versa. She said that this was not only based on shared history and interests, but more importantly on a common basis of shared values, in particular the common idea of the individual and the inalienable rights of the individual.

She said Europe and America were being called upon to "tear down walls of today," especially "the walls in the minds of people."

There was lengthy applause when she stated that there should be zero-tolerance towards issues like weapons of mass destruction and the likelihood of their falling into the hands of Iran, for instance, which she said would threaten "our security."

"A nuclear bomb in the hands of a president who denies the Holocaust … is not acceptable," Merkel said, adding: "The security of the state of Israel is for me non-negotiable - now and forever."

Climate change

Merkel also urged the US and Europe to take a leading role in negotiations on climate change ahead of the United Nations summit in Copenhagen next month.

"There is no doubt about it, in December the world will look to us, the Europeans and the Americans," Merkel told the joint session of Congress.

Barack Obama and Merkel at talks in WashingtonBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift: Obama called Merkel an extraordinary leader on the issue of climate change

"I am convinced that once we in Europe and in America show ourselves ready to adopt a climate agreement we will also be able to persuade China and India to come in," she added.

The chancellor wrapped up her address by drawing an analogy between two monuments. "The Freedom Bell in Berlin is like the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia: a symbol which reminds us that freedom does not come about of itself. It must be struggled for and then defended anew every day of our lives," Merkel said, adding: "In this endeavor, Germany and Europe will also in future remain strong and dependable partners for America. That I promise you…"


Obama heaps praise on Merkel

Earlier in the day, Merkel met with US President Barack Obama to discuss climate change and the war in Afghanistan.

Ahead of Merkel's address, President Obama spoke of the chancellor and Germany in glowing terms, saying the fact that she would be the first chancellor to address Congress in 50 years was "a very appropriate honor."

"Germany has been an extraordinarily strong ally on a whole host of international issues," Obama said with Merkel at his side in the White House.

He also said that Merkel herself "has been an extraordinary leader on the issue of climate change."

rb/AFP/dpa
Editor: Nancy Isenson

Merkel Addresses US Congress on Berlin Wall Anniversary

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.


03 November 2009

Germnay Chancellor Angela Merkel (File)
Germnay Chancellor Angela Merkel (File)
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in Washington to mark the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, is speaking later Tuesday to a joint meeting of both houses of the U.S. Congress.

She will be the first German leader to address the House or Senate since Konrad Adenauer in 1957.

Ms. Merkel says the chance to speak to the American lawmakers is a great honor and an opportunity to thank the United States for its support for German unification after the wall came down on November 9 in 1989.

The chancellor also will meet with President Barack Obama at the White House Tuesday. Their talks are expected to include the war in Afghanistan, Iran's nuclear program, economic issues and global warming.

Ms. Merkel is in the United States for the first time since she was re-elected to lead Germany's government in September.

The United States wants Germany and other NATO partners to make a bigger contribution to the war in Afghanistan and support tougher sanctions against Iran.

Germany would like to see the United States make deeper cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions, which many scientists say cause global warming.


Some information for this report was provided by AFP and Reuters.

U.S.S. New York Reaches Manhattan

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 3, 2009


The U.S.S. New York reached New York City Monday morning, sweeping under the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, pausing at the World Trade Center site and pushing along the Upper West Side before circling around, like a contestant in a beauty pageant, to dock in Midtown Manhattan.

It was the end of an inaugural five-day voyage from Norfolk, Va., for the ship’s official commissioning into the Navy fleet on Saturday, as well as an emotional “homecoming” for a vessel that was named for the state after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and has 7.5 tons of steel from the twin towers cast into its bow.

“It’s fantastic to be here,” said Cmdr. Curt Jones, the ship’s captain and a New York native, as he stepped out of the bridge to take in his surroundings. “It really does feel like we’re coming home.”

The sailors and Marines on board began lining along the rails of the ship early, well before 7 a.m., despite the wind and occasional drizzle that left many hopping from foot to foot to stay warm in their dress uniforms. The crew included a large number of New Yorkers who volunteered for the assignment, and they watched with anticipation as the city skyline emerged from a flat, gray dawn.

“I’ve seen this view before,” said Lavar Johnson, 29, a petty officer second class from Yonkers. “It’s just more significant now.”

The ship docked adjacent to the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum on Manhattan’s West Side. The sailors and Marines aboard will spend the days leading up to the commissioning ceremony giving public tours of the blocky but technologically sophisticated vessel, and the many pieces of expensive military equipment it contains. Once in service, the ship, an amphibious transport dock, will be used to transport up to seven hundred Marines and combat equipment to conflicts around the globe.

The Navy had raced to do the testing of the ship needed to meet its commissioning date, which is already emblazoned on a plaque inside. Lt. Rick Zabawa of Saratoga Springs, N.Y., who as the deck officer was the “conductor” of the ship’s movements in the hours before it docked, said the arrival in New York represented “the culmination of all this hard work.”

Those aboard were awakened Monday at 4 a.m., earlier than usual, with reveille whistles followed by the crackly sound of Frank Sinatra singing “New York, New York” over the loudspeaker. As the rest of those on board were eating pancakes and eggs in the galley or getting into their dress uniforms, those on the red-lighted bridge of the ship assumed a quiet intensity in anticipation of the final navigation into and up the Hudson River.

About 5 a.m., a small boat sped alongside the warship and Neil Keating, 52, a harbor pilot, clambered up the gray metal exterior to help guide the ship through the busy waters. Mr. Keating, 52, had requested the assignment more than a year ago because his brother, a firefighter, died when the towers collapsed.

“Today is bittersweet,” said Mr. Keating, who has helped ships travel in the harbor for more than 30 years. “For me, it’s an honor to be on board, but you hate to be on board for the reasons I am here. I think my brother would have been proud of me.”

By 6:30 a.m., the first of the sailors and Marines were making their way to the decks, to stake out good spots for the entry into the harbor. Some were excited about seeing New York for the first time, while others were enjoying the prospect of such a grand arrival to the area where they grew up.

“We’re riding through like the Cadillac of the fleet that we are,” said Sharef Talbert, 30, a petty officer first class from Newark, who has been readying the ship for its arrival since February. “There is no better way to ride into New York.”

As the ship continued up the river, helicopters rattled overhead and the surrounding waters filled with other vessels — police boats, tugs, barges, pleasure craft, and fireboats transformed into floating fountains. Spectators watched from the Circle Line. Rounding Battery Park, Cmdr. Erich B. Schmidt, the executive officer, spoke to the crew through a loudspeaker. “You’ve done a great job getting us here,” he said. “Enjoy it. That’s all.”

The ship came to a stop adjacent to ground zero, where a large crowd of onlookers had gathered along the shoreline, the military men lifted their hands in a long salute, followed by an honorary firing of guns. Some visibly teared up during the brief tribute.

Afterward, the ship continued up the Hudson past the Firemen’s Memorial, at 100th Street, which in the weeks after 9/11 New Yorkers filled with baskets of flowers, loose candles and sorrowful notes, and which to many still evokes the losses of that day. Passers-by stopped to watch the spectacle of the enormous warship heading toward the George Washington Bridge.

When the ship finally eased into to its berth in Midtown at 10 a.m., the front section of bow, where the celebrated section of steel breaks the waves, already revealed the early, unavoidable streaks of rust of a ship at sea.

Nina Bernstein contributed reporting.

Ford Posts an Unexpected Profit of $997 Million

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 3, 2009


DETROIT — While its crosstown rivals stumbled through bankruptcy this summer, the Ford Motor Company pressed its advantage, and delivered surprising news on Monday that its cost-cutting efforts and improving sales helped it earn nearly $1 billion in the third quarter.

But now it faces new challenges in maintaining that lead. Both General Motors and Chrysler, with the stigma of their bankruptcies receding, are moving ahead with their own comeback plans.

Under prodding from a new board, G.M. is aggressively marketing a 60-day money-back guarantee on its vehicles that most likely will result in market share gains to be announced on Tuesday.

And Chrysler and its new partner, Fiat, on Wednesday will disclose an ambitious five-year plan to streamline its product lineup and introduce more fuel-efficient models.

Ford is also running into resistance from its unionized work force as it tries to cut costs further.

Its improving fortunes were the main reason cited by the United Automobile Workers on Monday for rejecting another round of labor concessions that would have roughly matched concessions that workers at Chrysler and General Motors approved in the spring.

The U.A.W.’s president, Ron Gettelfinger, and its vice president in charge of the Ford unit, Bob King, said in a statement that the carmaker’s third-quarter profit was “evidence of the contributions that Ford workers have made.”

Ford, which earned $997 million in the third quarter and made money in North America for the first time since 2005, has turned itself around largely by cutting costs and introducing cars that consumers want to buy, rather than resorting to deep discounts to lure shoppers into showrooms.

But Ford also took advantage of the unfavorable perception that many consumers had of G.M. and Chrysler, which have needed huge infusions of federal aid to survive. Even Toyota has been losing money and, after significant recalls, been forced to defend its quality.

Toyota, like G.M. and Chrysler, is plotting its own turnaround effort, with a new president, Akio Toyoda, focused on restoring its once-pristine reputation.

“These difficult times have caused us to do some important soul-searching and approach the business in new and better ways,” Bob Carter, head of the Toyota division in the United States, told reporters in Detroit on Monday.

Ford is hardly sitting still under its chief executive, Alan R. Mulally, who joined the automaker three years ago from Boeing and, so far, has been the rare outsider to achieve success in Detroit.

“This is not so much a turning point as it is a proof point of the value of the plan and the strategy we’ve been following for three years,” Mr. Mulally said in an interview.

Ford did not offer a forecast for next year, and said only that it expected “solid profitability” no later than 2011, after previously saying it expected to break even that year. It is also more wary of making such predictions, after being forced to reverse rosy forecasts in the past.

Moody’s Investors Service on Monday raised Ford’s credit ratings based on the “substantial progress” it has seen in the automaker’s performance and financial health.

“The evidence we see indicates that Ford is on track in its plans to re-establish a sustainable and competitive business model,” Bruce Clark, a senior vice president at Moody’s, said in a note to investors.

Ford is also taking more steps to improve its balance sheet and increase the amount of available cash it has on hand.

The company ended the third quarter with $23.8 billion in cash, and reported positive cash flow of $2.8 billion during the three month period.

Ford’s chief financial officer, Lewis Booth, said on Monday that the company also would seek to raise about $3 billion by issuing new stock and equity-linked securities.

The route that Ford has taken thus far to profitability is one that, by all accounts, G.M. and Chrysler need to follow themselves.

When Ford chose not to ask for government loans, the company was freed to continue spending on new products like its Fusion and Taurus sedans.

G.M. and Chrysler, by comparison, had to rein in much of their product development programs to conserve cash while they awaited federal aid.

A report by the Government Accountability Office released on Monday said that the federal government was unlikely to recover much of the $81 billion that was invested in G.M. and Chrysler, their suppliers and related financing companies.

But with cleaner balance sheets and taxpayer cash to spend, G.M. and Chrysler are hoping their own turnaround efforts will take hold.

Ford proved during the third quarter that it can increase revenue and turn a profit even as the overall market slumps. In its core North American market, the company increased revenue by 26 percent, to $13.7 billion. It also reported a pre-tax profit of $357 million, compared to a loss of $2.6 billion in the third quarter of 2008.

“This improvement was primarily explained by favorable net pricing, lower materials costs, structural cost reductions, and improved market share,” the company said.

Ford had the lowest average incentive costs of the three Detroit-based automakers during October, according to the car research Web site Edmunds.com. As the automaker continues to bring out new products, like the coming Fiesta and Focus small cars, its incentive spending could fall even more, as consumers tend to be willing to pay closer to sticker price for new models.

The company also said that it had reduced its costs by $4.6 billion in the first nine months of the year, already exceeding its full-year goal of $4 billion.

A Free Credit Score Followed by a Monthly Bill

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 3, 2009


On television it’s hard to miss the wildly popular band of slackers singing ruefully from a shabby apartment or while waiting tables in pirate regalia. The ruined credit that led to their financial misfortune might have been sparkling if only they’d tracked their status on freecreditreport.com.

The Federal Trade Commission is not amused. It has long believed that the company that owns freecreditreport.com is deliberately diverting people from a government-mandated site where consumers can get free credit reports by law, and using the reports as a lure for a $14.95 monthly service that alerts subscribers to important changes in their credit status.

In an unusual salvo, the government has even produced its own spoof videos featuring a trio remarkably similar to the gang in the earlier commercials, singing a warning: “Other sites may turn your head; they say they’re free, don’t be misled. Once you’re in their tangled web, they’ll sell you something else instead.”

But while the government has taken issue with the ads, it has had little to say about credit monitoring services themselves, a rapidly expanding niche approaching $1 billion in sales for which millions of people have signed up, often unwittingly. The problem, say critics, is that most people really don’t need it.

Credit monitoring provides customers with real-time updates about changes to their credit files that might affect how lenders see them. These services can be useful for identity theft victims, for example, who want e-mail alerts about new accounts that thieves might have opened in their name.

Yet for the vast majority of consumers whose credit status doesn’t change quickly or drastically, a monitoring service is a waste of money, these critics say. Keeping a close eye on your bills and checking your credit report several times a year is enough.

And that can be done without spending a penny because the government requires the three major credit bureaus — Experian, which owns freecreditreport.com, Equifax and TransUnion — to provide one free report annually to consumers.

“Does the average person really need to see their credit reports more than once every four months? Do you need to look at it daily?” asked Edgar Dworsky, founder of ConsumerWorld.org and a former member of Experian’s consumer advisory panel, referring to credit monitoring services. “That’s paranoia.”

While other companies sell credit monitoring too, Experian is the biggest player in the lucrative niche of selling monthly monitoring. Nine million people are spending a total of $650 million to $700 million annually on the services, according to Carter Malloy, a Stephens Inc. analyst. Experian’s market share is more than twice that of its three main competitors combined. To replenish its rolls, the company relies heavily on its slacker ads, spending $54 million in 2008 to blanket the airwaves, according to TNS Media Intelligence.

The monitoring business is profitable enough that big credit card companies, including Capital One and Discover, now partner with Experian to sell private-label versions of the monitoring service directly to their customers, taking a cut of the fees and giving the rest to Experian.

So far, the F.T.C. has focused mostly on the free credit report come-on. In the last five years, Experian has paid $1.25 million to settle F.T.C. charges that it misled consumers who may have been seeking their free credit report at AnnualCreditReport.com, but ended up paying for a subscription on the similarly named freecreditreport.com.

Still, Experian continued to spend heavily on marketing that played to the anxiety many Americans feel about their credit amid the financial crisis. In an attempt to counter it, Congress attached a measure to a recently passed credit card reform law directing the F.T.C. to press sites like freecreditreport.com to provide more prominent disclosures.

Ty Taylor, president of Experian’s Consumer Direct division, said the company’s process was transparent. “You get a free credit report and free score for test-driving our product,” he said, referring to the credit monitoring service. “We’ve always felt that it’s been very upfront and a fair opportunity for the consumer to become more aware and comfortable with the credit reporting concept.”

Profiting From Confusion

Twenty years ago, the only way for most consumers to get a sense of their credit history was by buying their credit report from credit bureaus or getting it free if a lender rejected a loan because of something in the report. Credit reports contain, among other things, a list of past and current creditors and a record of the borrower’s payment history.

Meanwhile, a company called Fair Isaac had invented an algorithm for what is known as the FICO credit score. Scores range from 300 to 850 and helped lenders create high-priced loans for people with checkered histories while reserving the best rates for people with high scores.

The FICO score grew in importance in the mid-1990s as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac encouraged mortgage lenders to use them. Around the same time, a company called ConsumerInfo.com began selling credit monitoring. It acquired the freecreditreport.com domain name and gave out free credit reports (and, eventually, free credit scores) if consumers subscribed to the monitoring service. Experian bought the company in 2002.

The next year, to grant consumers better access to their credit information and allow them to check for errors, Congress required the three credit bureaus to give one free credit report to every American each year. Almost immediately, however, consumers started confusing the government-authorized site, AnnualCreditReport.com, with Experian’s freecreditreport.com site. Smelling opportunity, Experian bought ads on Google and other sites that diverted some people looking for their legally mandated credit reports.

At one point, the F.T.C. asked Experian to give it the freecreditreport.com URL to end the confusion, but the company declined. “Experian was not going to give it up,” said a spokeswoman, noting that the site had been in operation for years. The F.T.C. has since set up its own site at freecreditreport.gov.

Evan Hendricks, who used to serve on the consumer advisory panel for Experian and is now the editor and publisher of Privacy Times, said the company knew the Web site’s name would sow confusion.

“We had these roaring debates, saying you can’t call it freecreditreport.com because it’s not free,” said Mr. Hendricks, who has also been an expert witness on behalf of consumers suing to correct errors in their reports and has testified against Experian. “We had put them on notice,” he said. “But the money spoke louder.”

Peg Smith, Experian’s executive vice president of investor relations, said the company had to balance such feedback “against the overall needs of the nine million customers we already have, plus the overall commercial needs.” Experian allows users to cancel the monitoring service during a brief free trial period and keep the free credit report.

High Turnover

In many ways, this is the perfect moment for companies like Experian to convince consumers that they need to track their credit closely. Many people who fell behind on bills in the economic maelstrom worry about how their credit report will look to lenders now. A number of employers reject candidates with poor credit, too.

Even millions of the most careful consumers worry that they may not have escaped recent damage to their credit files: card issuers, in an attempt to limit risk, have cut credit limits, canceled dormant accounts and made other moves that can harm credit scores.

Preeti Sharma, a 36-year-old information technology manager in Princeton, N.J., signed up for Experian’s monitoring service when she and her husband were seeking a mortgage and worried about surprises that could increase their interest rate. “It brings in another angle that you don’t think about on a daily basis,” she said. Some, including Ms. Sharma, stick with the service afterward.

“Consumers just have an insatiable appetite to know what other people know about them,“ said Don Robert, Experian’s chief executive.

But many customers who sign up for credit monitoring quickly drop it. Michael Schwartz, 63, a retiree in Little Silver, N.J., canceled his Experian subscription after he realized he was paying a charge for a tool he didn’t need. With his house and cars paid off, and his children no longer in school, “it’s not really going to be critical to check credit on a monthly basis,” he added. Experian declined to provide turnover figures, but it said the average enrollment of a monitoring subscriber was under a year.

That is one reason its growing library of commercials is critical to replenishing its subscriber base and revenue, especially among the younger demographic profiled in the ads.

Philip Neustrom, a 25-year-old software engineer in San Francisco, canceled the Experian service after paying six months of $14.95 monthly fees and never using the monitoring. “I knew they had roped me into this thing after I started getting these e-mails,” he said. It took him a while to get around to canceling, he added, because he was busy and “there are only so many things you can do in a day.”

John Ulzheimer, who spent 13 years working for two rivals, said companies like Experian counted on consumers behaving this way. “It says it’s free in the song, but if you don’t cancel, then you start getting hit with a very nominal fee,” he said. “Consumers are busy, and studies have shown that they don’t do a very good job scouring their credit card statements. And they’ll generally discount a charge that is very low.”

‘A Big Moneymaker’

All of this has been good for Experian. At a time when many other financial services firms were struggling, revenue in its consumer credit business grew 20 percent in North America during the 12 months ended March 31. Experian said sales grew about 10 percent in the six months that ended Sept. 30 compared with the same period last year.

But even for its most useful function — spotting identity theft — credit monitoring is not foolproof, because evidence doesn’t always appear on credit reports or set off an alert. Thieves can evade notice when opening new bank accounts in a victim’s name, running up charges on existing accounts or using a victim’s identity to obtain medical care.

Consumers who don’t want to pay for monitoring can get one of their three free annual reports from each credit bureau every four months. New services like Credit.com, where Mr. Ulzheimer is the president of its educational services arm, CreditKarma and Quizzle can also provide free credit snapshots, though they generally don’t alert customers to changes in their reports.

Last month, in the wake of the new credit card legislation, the F.T.C. proposed that companies like Experian that market free credit reports show customers an entirely separate Web page before they enter credit card information and sign up for credit monitoring. The page would remind them that AnnualCreditReport.com is the only federally authorized site for free reports.

Experian, which has a less prominent disclosure, declined to predict how many subscribers a rule like that could cost it.

But for people like Alex Salb, a 22-year-old freelance copywriter in San Francisco, greater disclosure would not change perceptions about the underlying nature of the business.

He went to freecreditreport.com during his apartment hunt. But once he understood that the true purpose of the site was to hook people into a continuing monitoring subscription, he backed away. “It’s a big moneymaker. I’ve seen it from the inside,” said Mr. Salb, who used to sell subscriptions for personal life coaching.

“And it’s intentional. It’s not a slip-up on their part.”

Brent McDonald contributed reporting.

today's reading

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 3, 2009

Tuesday of the Thirty-first Week in Ordinary Time Lectionary: 486

Reading 1
Responsorial Psalm
Gospel

Reading 1
Rom 12:5-16ab

Brothers and sisters:
We, though many, are one Body in Christ
and individually parts of one another.
Since we have gifts that differ according to the grace given to us,
let us exercise them:
if prophecy, in proportion to the faith;
if ministry, in ministering;
if one is a teacher, in teaching;
if one exhorts, in exhortation;
if one contributes, in generosity;
if one is over others, with diligence;
if one does acts of mercy, with cheerfulness.

Let love be sincere;
hate what is evil,
hold on to what is good;
love one another with mutual affection;
anticipate one another in showing honor.
Do not grow slack in zeal,
be fervent in spirit,
serve the Lord.
Rejoice in hope,
endure in affliction,
persevere in prayer.
Contribute to the needs of the holy ones,
exercise hospitality.
Bless those who persecute you,
bless and do not curse them.
Rejoice with those who rejoice,
weep with those who weep.
Have the same regard for one another;
do not be haughty but associate with the lowly.


Responsorial Psalm
Ps 131:1bcde, 2, 3

R. In you, O Lord, I have found my peace.
O LORD, my heart is not proud,
nor are my eyes haughty;
I busy not myself with great things,
nor with things too sublime for me.
R. In you, O Lord, I have found my peace.
Nay rather, I have stilled and quieted
my soul like a weaned child.
Like a weaned child on its mother’s lap,
so is my soul within me.
R. In you, O Lord, I have found my peace.
O Israel, hope in the LORD,
both now and forever.
R. In you, O Lord, I have found my peace.


Gospel
Lk 14:15-24

One of those at table with Jesus said to him,
“Blessed is the one who will dine in the Kingdom of God.”
He replied to him,
“A man gave a great dinner to which he invited many.
When the time for the dinner came,
he dispatched his servant to say to those invited,
‘Come, everything is now ready.’
But one by one, they all began to excuse themselves.
The first said to him,
‘I have purchased a field and must go to examine it;
I ask you, consider me excused.’
And another said, ‘I have purchased five yoke of oxen
and am on my way to evaluate them;
I ask you, consider me excused.’
And another said, ‘I have just married a woman,
and therefore I cannot come.’
The servant went and reported this to his master.
Then the master of the house in a rage commanded his servant,
‘Go out quickly into the streets and alleys of the town
and bring in here the poor and the crippled,
the blind and the lame.’
The servant reported, ‘Sir, your orders have been carried out
and still there is room.’
The master then ordered the servant,
‘Go out to the highways and hedgerows
and make people come in that my home may be filled.
For, I tell you, none of those men who were invited will taste my dinner.’”

Monday, November 2, 2009

Many in U.S. Want Texting at the Wheel to Be Illegal

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 2, 2009


Nearly all Americans say sending a text message while driving should be illegal, and about half say texting while behind the wheel should be punished at least as harshly as drunken driving, according to a recent New York Times/CBS News poll.

“If you’re going to drive, drive; if you want to talk or text, pull over to the side of the road,” Constance Drake, 71, of Toms River, N.J., said in a follow-up interview.

Ninety-seven percent support the prohibition of texting while driving, an unusual level of agreement for any topic. Eighty percent also support a ban on talking on a hand-held cellphone while driving.

Fifty percent said the punishment for texting while driving should be just as severe as for drunken driving.

“Someone who is texting creates just as much of a danger as someone behind the wheel who is inebriated,” said Michael Brooks, 38, from Limerick, Pa.

An additional 2 percent said those who text while driving should be penalized even more rigorously than those who drink and drive.

Jim Deane, 31, from Idyllwild, Calif., disagreed. “It should be illegal because you have to take your eyes off the road, but I don’t think it reaches the same point as drunk driving because the driver is not impaired for the entire time,” he said.

Forty-three percent said motorists who text should not be treated like drunken drivers.

Concerns about distracted driving seem to be growing. Eighty percent said using a hand-held cellphone while driving should be illegal, up from 69 percent in a 2001 ABC News poll. But opinion reverses when the subject is hands-free cellphones.

Seventy percent have no problem with drivers who use a hands-free phone while behind the wheel, a view unchanged from what ABC News found in 2001.

This turnabout appears to be related to the view that hands-free cellphones are safer than hand-held ones. Two-thirds of those surveyed in the recent poll said it was safer to talk and drive using a hands-free cellphone, and almost 9 in 10 of them said the practice should be legal.

Studies have shown that cellphone use by drivers is a serious hazard, and that hands-free phones do not eliminate the risk.

The nationwide telephone poll was conducted Oct. 5-8 with 829 adults and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Complete survey results and methodology are available at nytimes.com/polls.

The Commemoration of All the Faithful Departed (All Souls)

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 2, 2009


(The following readings are selected from the options for this day.)
Lectionary: 668

Reading 1
Responsorial Psalm
Reading 2
Gospel

Reading 1
Wis 3:1-9

The souls of the just are in the hand of God,
and no torment shall touch them.
They seemed, in the view of the foolish, to be dead;
and their passing away was thought an affliction
and their going forth from us, utter destruction.
But they are in peace.
For if before men, indeed, they be punished,
yet is their hope full of immortality;
chastised a little, they shall be greatly blessed,
because God tried them
and found them worthy of himself.
As gold in the furnace, he proved them,
and as sacrificial offerings he took them to himself.
In the time of their visitation they shall shine,
and shall dart about as sparks through stubble;
they shall judge nations and rule over peoples,
and the Lord shall be their King forever.
Those who trust in him shall understand truth,
and the faithful shall abide with him in love:
because grace and mercy are with his holy ones,
and his care is with his elect.


Responsorial Psalm
Ps 23:1-3a, 3b-4, 5, 6

R. (1) The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I shall want.
or:
R. Though I walk in the valley of darkness, I fear no evil, for you are with me.
The LORD is my shepherd; I shall not want.
In verdant pastures he gives me repose;
beside restful waters he leads me;
he refreshes my soul.
R. The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I shall want.
or:
R. Though I walk in the valley of darkness, I fear no evil, for you are with me.
He guides me in right paths
for his name’s sake.
Even though I walk in the dark valley
I fear no evil; for you are at my side
with your rod and your staff
that give me courage.
R. The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I shall want.
or:
R. Though I walk in the valley of darkness, I fear no evil, for you are with me.
You spread the table before me
in the sight of my foes;
You anoint my head with oil;
my cup overflows.
R. The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I shall want.
or:
R. Though I walk in the valley of darkness, I fear no evil, for you are with me.
Only goodness and kindness follow me
all the days of my life;
and I shall dwell in the house of the LORD
for years to come.
R. The Lord is my shepherd; there is nothing I shall want.
or:
R. Though I walk in the valley of darkness, I fear no evil, for you are with me.


Reading II
Rom 5:5-11

Brothers and sisters:
Hope does not disappoint,
because the love of God has been poured out into our hearts
through the Holy Spirit that has been given to us.
For Christ, while we were still helpless,
died at the appointed time for the ungodly.
Indeed, only with difficulty does one die for a just person,
though perhaps for a good person
one might even find courage to die.
But God proves his love for us
in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us.
How much more then, since we are now justified by his Blood,
will we be saved through him from the wrath.
Indeed, if, while we were enemies,
we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son,
how much more, once reconciled,
will we be saved by his life.
Not only that,
but we also boast of God through our Lord Jesus Christ,
through whom we have now received reconciliation.

or

Rom 6:3-9

Brothers and sisters:
Are you unaware that we who were baptized into Christ Jesus
were baptized into his death?
We were indeed buried with him through baptism into death,
so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead
by the glory of the Father,
we too might live in newness of life.

For if we have grown into union with him through a death like his,
we shall also be united with him in the resurrection.
We know that our old self was crucified with him,
so that our sinful body might be done away with,
that we might no longer be in slavery to sin.
For a dead person has been absolved from sin.
If, then, we have died with Christ,
we believe that we shall also live with him.
We know that Christ, raised from the dead, dies no more;
death no longer has power over him.


Gospel
Jn 6:37-40

Jesus said to the crowds:
“Everything that the Father gives me will come to me,
and I will not reject anyone who comes to me,
because I came down from heaven not to do my own will
but the will of the one who sent me.
And this is the will of the one who sent me,
that I should not lose anything of what he gave me,
but that I should raise it on the last day.
For this is the will of my Father,
that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him
may have eternal life,
and I shall raise him on the last day.”

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Solemnity of All Saints

Thank you for your time with my blogs and welcome back in the near future.

November 1, 2009


Lectionary: 667

Reading 1
Responsorial Psalm
Reading 2
Gospel

Reading 1
Rv 7:2-4, 9-14

I, John, saw another angel come up from the East,
holding the seal of the living God.
He cried out in a loud voice to the four angels
who were given power to damage the land and the sea,
“Do not damage the land or the sea or the trees
until we put the seal on the foreheads of the servants of our God.”
I heard the number of those who had been marked with the seal,
one hundred and forty-four thousand marked
from every tribe of the children of Israel.

After this I had a vision of a great multitude,
which no one could count,
from every nation, race, people, and tongue.
They stood before the throne and before the Lamb,
wearing white robes and holding palm branches in their hands.
They cried out in a loud voice:

“Salvation comes from our God, who is seated on the throne,
and from the Lamb.”

All the angels stood around the throne
and around the elders and the four living creatures.
They prostrated themselves before the throne,
worshiped God, and exclaimed:

“Amen. Blessing and glory, wisdom and thanksgiving,
honor, power, and might
be to our God forever and ever. Amen.”

Then one of the elders spoke up and said to me,
“Who are these wearing white robes, and where did they come from?”
I said to him, “My lord, you are the one who knows.”
He said to me,
“These are the ones who have survived the time of great distress;
they have washed their robes
and made them white in the Blood of the Lamb.”


Responsorial Psalm
Ps 24:1bc-2, 3-4ab, 5-6

R. (see 6) Lord, this is the people that longs to see your face.
The LORD’s are the earth and its fullness;
the world and those who dwell in it.
For he founded it upon the seas
and established it upon the rivers.
R. Lord, this is the people that longs to see your face.
Who can ascend the mountain of the LORD?
or who may stand in his holy place?
One whose hands are sinless, whose heart is clean,
who desires not what is vain.
R. Lord, this is the people that longs to see your face.
He shall receive a blessing from the LORD,
a reward from God his savior.
Such is the race that seeks him,
that seeks the face of the God of Jacob.
R. Lord, this is the people that longs to see your face.


Reading II
1 Jn 3:1-3

Beloved:
See what love the Father has bestowed on us
that we may be called the children of God.
Yet so we are.
The reason the world does not know us
is that it did not know him.
Beloved, we are God’s children now;
what we shall be has not yet been revealed.
We do know that when it is revealed we shall be like him,
for we shall see him as he is.
Everyone who has this hope based on him makes himself pure,
as he is pure.


Gospel
Mt 5:1-12a

When Jesus saw the crowds, he went up the mountain,
and after he had sat down, his disciples came to him.
He began to teach them, saying:

“Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the Kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are they who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the land.
Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be satisfied.
Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
Blessed are the clean of heart,
for they will see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.
Blessed are they who are persecuted for the sake of righteousness,
for theirs is the Kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are you when they insult you and persecute you
and utter every kind of evil against you falsely because of me.
Rejoice and be glad,
for your reward will be great in heaven.”